<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>critiques on are you electronic</title><link>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/critiques/</link><description>Recent content in critiques on are you electronic</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><managingEditor>justin@areyouelectronic.com (Justin Garofoli)</managingEditor><webMaster>justin@areyouelectronic.com (Justin Garofoli)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 07:15:25 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/critiques/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>options</title><link>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/2026/options/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 07:15:25 -0700</pubDate><author>justin@areyouelectronic.com (Justin Garofoli)</author><guid>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/2026/options/</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The advice is that you want more options, keep your options open and collect more of them, and that&rsquo;s the way to succeed in a highly uncertain situation.
One aspect of really <em>having</em> an option is to understand that option.
Writing a thing isn&rsquo;t the same as knowing the costs and gains of doing it.</p>
<p>In my personal framework for possessing lots of options there are three levels and a few more steps.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tags: <a href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/critiques/">#critiques</a></p><p>The advice is that you want more options, keep your options open and collect more of them, and that&rsquo;s the way to succeed in a highly uncertain situation.
One aspect of really <em>having</em> an option is to understand that option.
Writing a thing isn&rsquo;t the same as knowing the costs and gains of doing it.</p>
<p>In my personal framework for possessing lots of options there are three levels and a few more steps.</p>
<ul>
<li>On <strong>Level 1</strong> the option exists and is within your adjacent possible whether you know it or not. This is just a long way of saying that you always have options whether you know it or not. That&rsquo;s comforting, in a way.</li>
<li>At <strong>Level 2</strong> you are aware that the option is there; it&rsquo;s on a list somewhere because you&rsquo;ve identified and named it. It can be the first one, lists gotta start somehow.</li>
<li>To obtain <strong>Level 3</strong> you&rsquo;ve explored the option and have enough understanding of what it takes to use it. Maybe you&rsquo;ve rejected it in favor of a better one, but it&rsquo;s still kicking around. This is what makes the option yours.</li>
</ul>
<p>Repeat that conveyor belt and store the output.
Now you&rsquo;ve got some things that you could do.
Think about them and consider how to use them in your current context.
Rank them relative to each other.
You&rsquo;re probably in &ldquo;I know my options&rdquo; territory now.</p>
<p>Doesn&rsquo;t hurt to step back and revisit the situation, make sure you haven&rsquo;t missed anything or not thought about it from all the angles.
It might not be actually all your options, but with effort it can be a good approximation.</p>
<p>I think it&rsquo;s really important to keep the lower ranked options around, but relegated and out of the way.
Consult that list of ideas from time to time.
Some old discarded idea might be a great idea when new certainty has presented itself amidst all that uncertainty.
Having this store of unforgotten ideas is a resource, a stockpile, even generative when you need it to be.
You&rsquo;ve engaged with these options already and thought, practically, how they work in a particular context.
That&rsquo;s a lot of thinking, don&rsquo;t throw it away!</p>
<p>One additional note.
Some people can effectively do this entirely in their head.
I am not one of them and it doesn&rsquo;t matter.
What matters is making an options factory.
If you need a tool, a notebook, a PKM software, whatever, who cares.
This is only an implementation detail.
Make it work for you, however you do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>change the channel</title><link>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/2026/change-the-channel/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 20:48:31 -0700</pubDate><author>justin@areyouelectronic.com (Justin Garofoli)</author><guid>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/2026/change-the-channel/</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The trends today that feel forced and presented and manipulative and really only there for some reason <em>other</em> than because people want them, the selected shouting and distilled intensity, it&rsquo;s all exhausting.
Can people just be normal for a minute?
The algorithm that concentrates anything it comes near has leaked out and it is unsustainable that everything everywhere is infected.
It&rsquo;s gone meta, the optimization of itself has become so much that it is becoming visible and annoying too.
Not only has the subject been optimized for attention, the Jackass antics of stupid stunts like pushing a shopping cart into the curb for a dumb crash video<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> have been completely amped up to crashing a train into a giant hole,<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2</a></sup> but every other aspect of the production around the idiotic stunt has been iterated, focus grouped, a/b&rsquo;ed, and maximized to the nth degree.
And this is old news.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tags: <a href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/attention/">#attention</a> <a href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/platforms/">#platforms</a> <a href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/critiques/">#critiques</a></p><p>The trends today that feel forced and presented and manipulative and really only there for some reason <em>other</em> than because people want them, the selected shouting and distilled intensity, it&rsquo;s all exhausting.
Can people just be normal for a minute?
The algorithm that concentrates anything it comes near has leaked out and it is unsustainable that everything everywhere is infected.
It&rsquo;s gone meta, the optimization of itself has become so much that it is becoming visible and annoying too.
Not only has the subject been optimized for attention, the Jackass antics of stupid stunts like pushing a shopping cart into the curb for a dumb crash video<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> have been completely amped up to crashing a train into a giant hole,<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2</a></sup> but every other aspect of the production around the idiotic stunt has been iterated, focus grouped, a/b&rsquo;ed, and maximized to the nth degree.
And this is old news.</p>
<p>In a way it is a kind of democratization.
These tools and techniques used to be limited to professional commercial firms that had the money, the knowhow, the motivation, and the interest to bother.
It was annoying then.
Now everyone can use them, everyone is a brand.
All the tutorials are on the internet there for anyone to try.
Platforms added the ability to apply the methods and now this crap is everywhere.
And that enabling of more people to try is great.
What&rsquo;s not great is that the rest of us have to suffer through an endless feast of slop.
Even top tier content is polluted with this accelerationist intensity.</p>
<p>This culture, the culture of intensity, is overdone.
And it is all a scam, a way to get something out of the people that they wouldn&rsquo;t otherwise bother about.
Attention scams, financial scams, movement scams.
And it&rsquo;s the easiest one in the world to escape from because all you have to do is engage less with the intensity, and with less intensity.
Choose to do something else.
Look away from the feed, look outside, look at a picture, anything.
I choose something else.</p>
<p>This one pathway to attention, the make it as much of itself<sup id="fnref:3"><a href="#fn:3" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">3</a></sup> as possible way, as much anger or awful, it is not the only way.
Much of the best art and craft things are dialed back a little.
They can be subtle and inspire, or edited to relax and bring peace.
Well crafted things can be developed to be something else, something original and genuine and intensely personal, and so universal.
Just change the channel.</p>
<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn:1">
<p>I should <a href="https://youtu.be/zje8OeqEvmY?si=k5a_njBYFL2vMfbe">look this</a> up and re-watch it.
I bet it&rsquo;s so slow and tame and boring compared to today&rsquo;s versions. Yup it&rsquo;s dumb. To be fair, I thought it was dumb in the 90s too.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:2">
<p>I mean <a href="https://youtu.be/fuhE6PYnRMc?si=JPhRtnWD4G8i61kB">this one</a>, which I have not watched. The waste of it offends me. I am not made for the internet.&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:3">
<p>Can you intensify a tortilla? What is the most intense form of that form?&#160;<a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>