<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scott-Alexander on are you electronic</title><link>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/scott-alexander/</link><description>Recent content in Scott-Alexander on are you electronic</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:58:00 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.areyouelectronic.com/tags/scott-alexander/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>scott alexander on blogging right</title><link>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/scott-on-blogging/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:58:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.areyouelectronic.com/posts/scott-on-blogging/</guid><description>&lt;p>Scott Alexander, in my opinion, always always writes too many words. But he&amp;rsquo;s also a better writer and thinker than I am. His style usually doesn&amp;rsquo;t work for me, but it is inarguably successful in the rationalist crowd. that I am curious about even if I am also skeptical and think they take some things too far. The rationalists do have their uses though.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This particular post is one that I cannot refuse, but even with the succulent topic of &lt;em>blogging right&lt;/em>, he still has too many words for me. For your benefit, and future me too, I pull out some of the good bits.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>